8.4.1. If Statements in assembly

Let’s take a look at the getSmallest() function in assembly. For convenience, the function is reproduced below:

int getSmallest(int x, int y) {
    int smallest;
    if ( x > y ) {
        smallest = y;
    else {
        smallest = x;
    return smallest;

The corresponding assembly code extracted from GDB looks similar to the following:

(gdb) disas getSmallest
Dump of assembler code for function getSmallest:
  0x08048411 <+6>:   mov    0x8(%ebp),%eax
  0x08048414 <+9>:   cmp    0xc(%ebp),%eax
  0x08048417 <+12>:  jle    0x8048421 <getSmallest+22>
  0x08048419 <+14>:  mov    0xc(%ebp),%eax
  0x0804841f <+20>:  jmp    0x8048427 <getSmallest+28>
  0x08048421 <+22>:  mov    0x8(%ebp),%eax
  0x08048427 <+28>:  ret

This is a different view of the assembly code than what we have seen before. Here, we can see the address associated with each instruction, but not the bytes. Note that this assembly segment has been lightly edited for the sake of simplicity. The instructions that are normally part of function creation/termination (i.e. push %ebp and mov %esp, %ebp) and for allocating space on the stack are removed. By convention, gcc places the first parameter and second parameters of a function at locations %ebp+8 and %ebp+0xc (or %ebp+12) respectively. For the sake of clarity, we refer to these parameters as x and y respectively.

Let’s trace through the first few lines of the above assembly code snippet. Please note that we will not draw out the stack explicitly in this example. We leave this as an exercise for the reader, and encourage you to practice your stack tracing skills by drawing it out yourself.

  • The mov instruction copies the value located at address %ebp+8 (the first parameter, x) and places it in register %eax. The instruction pointer (%eip) is set to the address of the next instruction, or 0x08048414.

  • The cmp instruction compares the value at location %ebp+12 (i.e. the second parameter, or y) to x and sets appropriate condition code flag registers. Register %eip advances to the address of the next instruction, or 0x08048417.

  • The jle on the third line indicates that if x is less than or equal to y, the next instruction that executes is at location <getSmallest+22> (or mov 0x8(%ebp), %eax) and that %eip should be set to address 0x8048421. Otherwise, %eip is set to the next instruction in sequence, or 0x08048419.

The next instructions to execute depend on whether the program follows the branch (i.e. executes the jump) on line 3 (<getSmallest+12>). Let’s first suppose that the branch was not followed. In this case, %eip is set to 0x08048419 (i.e. <getSmallest+14>) and the following sequence of instructions execute:

  • The mov 0xc(%ebp),%eax instruction at <getSmallest+14> copies y to register %eax. Register %eip advances to 0x0804841f.

  • The jmp instruction sets register %eip to address 0x8048427.

  • The last instruction to execute is the ret instruction, signifying the end of the function. In this case, %eax contains y, and getSmallest() returns y.

Now, suppose that the branch was taken at <getSmallest+12>. In other words, the jle instruction sets register %eip to 0x8048421 (i.e. <getSmallest+22>). Then, the next instructions to execute are:

  • The mov 0x8(%ebp),%eax instruction at address 0x8048421, which copies the x to register %eax. Register %eip advances to 0x08048427.

  • The last instruction that executes is ret, signifying the end of the function. In this case, %eax contains x, and getSmallest() returns x.

We can then annotate the above assembly as follows:

0x08048411 <+6>:   mov   0x8(%ebp),%eax             #copy x to %eax
0x08048414 <+9>:   cmp   0xc(%ebp),%eax             #compare x with y
0x08048417 <+12>:  jle   0x8048421 <getSmallest+22> #if (x <= y) goto <getSmallest+22>
0x08048419 <+14>:  mov   0xc(%ebp),%eax             #copy y to %eax
0x0804841f <+20>:  jmp   0x8048427 <getSmallest+28> #goto <getSmallest+28>
0x08048421 <+22>:  mov   0x8(%ebp),%eax             #copy x to %eax
0x08048427 <+28>:  ret                              #exit function (return %eax)

Translating this back to C code yields:

Table 1. Translating getSmallest() into goto C form and C code.
Goto Form Translated C code
int getSmallest(int x, int y) {
    int smallest;
    if (x <= y) {
        goto assign_x;
    smallest = y;
    goto done;

    smallest = x;

    return smallest;
int getSmallest(int x, int y) {
    int smallest;
    if (x <= y) {
        smallest = x;
    else {
        smallest = y;
    return smallest;

In Table 1, the variable smallest corresponds to register %eax. If x is less than or equal to y, the code executes the statement smallest = x, which is associated with the goto label assign_x in our goto form of this function. Otherwise, the statement smallest = y is executed. The goto label done is used to indicate that the value in smallest should be returned.

Notice that the above C translation of the assembly code is a bit different than the original getSmallest() function. These differences don’t matter; a close inspection of both functions reveals that the two programs are logically equivalent. However, the compiler first converts any if-statement into an equivalent goto form which results in the slightly different, but equivalent version. Table 2 shows the standard if-statement format and its equivalent goto form:

Table 2. Standard if-statement format and its equivalent goto form.
C if-statement Compiler’s equivalent goto form
if (condition) {
else {
    if (!condition) {
        goto else;
    goto done;

Compilers translating code into assembly designate a jump when a condition is true. Contrast this behavior with the structure of an if-statement, where a "jump" (to the else) occurs when conditions are not true. The goto form captures this difference in logic.

Considering the original goto translation of the getSmallest() function, we can see:

  • x >= y corresponds to !condition

  • smallest = x is the else_statement.

  • The line smallest = y is the then_statement.

  • The last line in the function is return smallest.

Rewriting the original version of the function with the above annotations yields:

int getSmallest(int x, int y) {
    int smallest;
    if (x > y) {     //!(x <= y)
        smallest = y; //then_statement
    else {
        smallest = x; //else_statement
    return smallest;

The version shown above is identical to the original getSmallest() function. Keep in mind that a function written in different ways in the C language can translate to the same set of assembly instructions.

The cmov instructions

The last set of conditional instructions we cover are conditional move (cmov) instructions. The cmp, test and jmp instructions implement a conditional transfer of control in a program. In other words, the execution of the program branches in many directions. This can be very problematic for optimizing code, since these branches are very expensive.

In contrast the cmov instruction implements a conditional transfer of data. In other words, both the then-statement` and else-statement` of the conditional are executed, and the data is placed in the appropriate register based on the result of the condition.

The use of C’s ternary expression often results in the compiler generating a cmov instruction in place of jumps. For the standard if-then-else statement, the ternary expression has the form:

result = (condition) ? then_statement : else_statement;

Let’s use this format to rewrite the getSmallest() function as a ternary expression. Keep in mind that this new version of the function behaves exactly as the original getSmallest() function:

int getSmallest_cmov(int x, int y) {
    return x > y ? y : x;

While this may not seem like a big change, let’s look at the resulting assembly. Recall that the first and second parameters (x and y) are stored at stack addresses %ebp+0x8 and %ebp+0xc respectively:

0x08048441 <+0>:   push   %ebp              #save ebp
0x08048442 <+1>:   mov    %esp,%ebp         #update ebp
0x08048444 <+3>:   mov    0xc(%ebp),%eax    #copy y to %eax
0x08048447 <+6>:   cmp    %eax,0x8(%ebp)    #compare x with y
0x0804844a <+9>:   cmovle 0x8(%ebp),%eax    #if (x <= y) copy x to %eax
0x0804844e <+13>:  pop    %ebp              #restore %ebp
0x0804844f <+14>:  ret                      #return %eax

The above assembly code has no jumps. After the comparison of x and y, x moves into the return register only if x is less than or equal to y. Like the jump instructions, the suffix of the cmov instructions indicates the condition on which the conditional move occurs. Table 3 lists the set of conditional move instructions.

Table 3. The cmov instructions.
Signed Unsigned Description

cmove (cmovz)

move if equal (==)

cmovne (cmovnz)

move if not equal (!=)


move if negative


move if non-negative

cmovg (cmovnle)

cmova (cmovnbe)

move if greater (>)

cmovge (cmovnl)

cmovae (cmovnb)

move if greater than or equal (>=)

cmovl (cmovnge)

cmovb (cmovnae)

move if less (<)

cmovle (cmovng)

cmovbe (cmovna)

move if less than or equal (<=)

The compiler is very cautious about converting jump instructions into cmov instructions, especially in cases where side effects and pointer values are involved. Table 4 shows two equivalent ways of writing a function, incrementX():

Table 4. Two functions that attempt to increment the value of integer x.
C code C ternary form
int incrementX(int * x) {
    if (x != NULL) { //if x is not NULL
        return (*x)++; //increment x
    else { //if x is NULL
        return 1; //return 1
int incrementX2(int * x){
    return x ? (*x)++ : 1;

Each function takes a pointer to an integer as input and checks if it is NULL. If x is not NULL, the function increments and returns the dereferenced value of x. Otherwise, the function returns the value 1.

It is tempting to think that incrementX2() uses a cmov instruction since it uses a ternary expression. However, both functions yield the exact same assembly code:

0x080484cf <+0>:   push   %ebp
0x080484d0 <+1>:   mov    %esp,%ebp
0x080484d2 <+3>:   cmpl   $0x0,0x8(%ebp)
0x080484d6 <+7>:   je     0x80484e7 <incrementX2+24>
0x080484d8 <+9>:   mov    0x8(%ebp),%eax
0x080484db <+12>:  mov    (%eax),%eax
0x080484dd <+14>:  lea    0x1(%eax),%ecx
0x080484e0 <+17>:  mov    0x8(%ebp),%edx
0x080484e3 <+20>:  mov    %ecx,(%edx)
0x080484e5 <+22>:  jmp    0x80484ec <incrementX2+29>
0x080484e7 <+24>:  mov    $0x1,%eax
0x080484ec <+29>:  pop    %ebp
0x080484ed <+30>:  ret

Recall that the cmov instruction executes both branches of the conditional. In other words, x gets dereferenced no matter what. Consider the case where x is a null pointer. Recall that dereferencing a null pointer leads to a null pointer exception in the code, which will lead a program to seg-fault. To prevent any chance of this happening, the compiler takes the safe road and uses jumps.